Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Hornea v. GOL Linhas Areas Inteligentes S.A. et al
as 1:2020cv04243
Defendant:
Paulo Sergio Kakinoff, Richard Freeman Lark Jr. and GOL Linhas Areas Inteligentes S.A.
Plaintiff:
Lucian Hornea
Lhota v. Perez et al
as 2:2010cv00763
Plaintiff:
William G. Lhota
Defendant:
Clotilde Perez, Zenaida Perez, Timothy T. Lainhart and others
Counter_claimant:
Daniel McMahon
Counter_defendant:
William G. Lhota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Freeman et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2010cv02278
Plaintiff:
J. Richard Freeman and Mary C. Freeman
Defendant:
Regions Bank , Morgan Asset Management, Inc. , Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 3:2009cv01069
Plaintiff:
J. Richard Freeman, J. Richard Freeman, Mary C. Freeman and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal: Securities Fraud
Freeman et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 3:2008cv01060
Plaintiff:
J. Richard Freeman, J. Richard Freeman, Mary C. Freeman and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: SFBC International Inc, et al, et al
as 08-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. HAYES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AR TEACHER RET SYS
Plaintiff:
MA PENSION FUND GRP, MA PUB PENSION FUNDS, BEROUKHIM GRP and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
FRED KEPLER and HELEN KEPLER
Defendant:
E. COOPER SHAMBLEN, MARC LEBEL, GERALD SEIFER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD HANTMAN, GREGORY B. HOLMES, JACK LEVINE and others
Richard Freeman, et al. v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., et al.
as SC/2:00-CV-02184
Defendant:
Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd
Plaintiff:
Richard Freeman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
