Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06483
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Henry Jones v. The State Administrative High, et al
as 20-6150
Plaintiff / Appellant: HENRY LEE JONES
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL D. KEYS, TERRY FOSTER, JAMES THOMAS and others
Ricky Bell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2576
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH JOHNNIE, Doctor and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICKY BELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Gonzalez (Simmons)
as 17-2104
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Omar Gonzalez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Nelson Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Nell, Juan Camacho, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Pito, AKA Papito Camacho and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lawrence Simmons, AKA Sealed Defendant 12, AKA Black
Rickey Bell v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
as CAC/2:16-cv-01333
Plaintiff: Ricky Bell
Defendant: Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
Rickey Bell v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01333
Plaintiff: Ricky Bell
Defendant: Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
In re: James Clark, Jr.
as 15-5614
Movant: In re: JAMES W. CLARK, JR.
Respondent: RICKY BELL
In re: James Stout
as 14-6289
Movant: In re: JAMES P. STOUT
Respondent: RICKY BELL
United States of America v. Gonzalez ( Omar Gonzalez)
as 12-5075
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Nelson Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Nell, Juan Camacho, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Pito, AKA Papito Camacho, Geraldo Martinez, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Macho and others
Defendant - Appellant: Omar Gonzalez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?