Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Philippe Zatta v. Steven Eldred, et al
as 19-56483
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH D. MCHORNEY, in his personal and official capacities; Manager of Orange County Department of Child Support Services, STEVE CORSI, in his personal and official capacities; Director of Missouri Department of Social Services, GOLI MARIUS BEUGRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIPPE ZOGBE ZATTA
Bey v. United States Government Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv02111
Plaintiff:
Maurese Bey
Defendant:
United States Government Corporation, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Jane Doe I, et al v. Robert P. McCulloch, et al
as 08-3510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Matt Blunt, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah W. Nixon, et al
as 08-3476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri and Matt Blunt, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Steven Schicker, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Ballwin, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and others
Doe I et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2008cv01518
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, John Doe I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, Thomas O'Connor, Steven Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
