Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co
as LAW/2:23-CV-01610
Plaintiff:
Smith, Robin Smith and Mark Smith
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co
James Harris v. County of Lake, et al
as 21-16054
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT MONREAL, WELLPATH, TRAVIS BROOKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAVELL HARRIS
Chioini et al v. Wolin et al
as 2:2018cv11884
Plaintiff:
Robert Chioini and Thomas Klema
Defendant:
Benjamin Wolin, Mark Ravich, John Cooper and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Patrick Bagley and Ronald Boyd
Counter_claimant:
Rockwell Medical, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Thomas Klema and Robert Chioini
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Rockwell Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
McDowell et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as GAN/1:17-cv-03502
Plaintiff:
Andrew McDowell , Jennifer Parker , Morgan McClung and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mattie King et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as CAC/2:14-cv-01823
Plaintiff:
Mattie King , Frieda Genauer , Frances Davis and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-21322
Plaintiff:
Robin Smith and James Edward Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Smith v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:12-cv-10653
Plaintiff:
Robin Smith
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Robin Smith v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Robin Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
