Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Copeland et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
Don Copeland, Joseph Murray, Carol Smith and others
Defendant:
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jeweltex Manufacturing Retirement Plan v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Howell M. Estes, III, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Sundaram v. Freshworks Inc et al
as 3:2022cv06750
Plaintiff:
MOHAN R. SUNDARAM and Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
FRESHWORKS INC, RATHNA GIRISH MATHRUBOOTHAM, TYLER SLOAT and others
Petitioner:
Vivek Nagarajan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Veronica McCluskey v. William and Roxanne Hendricks
as 2:2021cv01188
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCluskey
Defendant:
Roxanne Hendricks and William Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wicks et al v. Patelco Credit Union
as 4:2020cv04586
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bustamante, Claudine Saldivar and Roxanne Wicks
Defendant:
Patelco Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra
Concierge Auctions, LLC et al v. Marterie et al
as 3:2019cv01032
Respondent:
Anthony J. Marterie and Roxanne Marterie
Petitioner:
Christine Wilhelm and Concierge Auctions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
