Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Starr Aviation Agency, Inc. v. AUA, Inc et al
as 3:2014mc00008
Plaintiff:
Starr Aviation Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
AUA, Inc and Richard E Rushing, Jr
Starr Aviation Unlimited Agency, Inc v. AUA, Inc et al
as 3:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
Starr Aviation Unlimited Agency, Inc
Defendant:
AUA, Inc and Richard E Rushing, Jr
Rush v. NCB Management Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sanford D Rush
Defendant:
NCB Management Services, Inc. and Corey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rush v. Associates Asset Management, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
Associates Asset Management, LLC and Mark Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rush v. American Medical Collection Agency et al
as 2:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
American Medical Collection Agency and Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rush v. AIS Services, LLC
as 2:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
AIS Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rush v. Tri-County Collection Agency, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
Tri-County Collection Agency, Inc, TCCA/CBET Credit Bureau Collection Division, Harold L Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rush v. Associates Asset Management, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
Associates Asset Management, LLC, Jane Phillips and Turner Green Afrasiabi and Arledge, LLP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rush v. Cimplify
as 2:2008cv00282
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
Cimplify
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rush v. Greeneville Collection Service, Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Sanford L Rush
Defendant:
Greeneville Collection Service, Incorporated and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
