Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Keith Smith v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 21-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Debtor / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-3253
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, PROBATION & PAROLE, VIOLATION 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-3252
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-2465
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-2369
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-2239
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, PROBATION & PAROLE, VIOLATION 4 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-1794
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 20-1573
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 19-1297
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Ronald Dandar v. Superintendent Cresson SCI, et al
as 19-1295
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
