Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BROWN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01586
Petitioner:
SUSAN BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00842
Plaintiff:
Adams, Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Richard Brown, I v. Susan Brown-Thill
as 21-3295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard L. Brown, I
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Brown-Thill, Individually
Moses McCormick, et al v. Franklin County Court, et al
as 19-16538
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY S. ANDERSON, TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as FBI Columbus 2 Unknown Final Policy Enforcers; named as Deputy Clerk Steve in original complaint; named as Does 1 - 25, inclusive in original complaint and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MCCORMICK and MOSES MCCORMICK
Susan Brown, et al v. BankUnited, NA, et al
as 17-10821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN BROWN and DAVID STONE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANKUNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, BANKUNITED, N.A., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION (THE) and others
:
SERVICE
Kurtz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as TXN/3:16-cv-00963
Plaintiff:
Barbara Kurtz , Susan Brown , Carol Kiel and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Brown et al v. BankUnited Trust 2005-1 et al
as 1:2014cv22855
Plaintiff:
Susan Brown , David Stone , United States of America and others
Defendant:
BankUnited Trust 2005-1, BankUnited, NA , Bear Sterns and Successors and or Assigns and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Susan Brown-Thill v. Richard Brown
as 13-1797
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Susan Brown-Thill
Defendant - Appellant:
Richard L. Brown
Richard Brown v. Susan Brown-Thill
as 13-1795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard L. Brown
Defendant:
James Cooper
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Brown-Thill
Susan Brown-Thill v. Richard Brown
as 13-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Susan Brown-Thill
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard L. Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
