Cases 1 - 9 of 9
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Susana Sanchez individually and d/b/a El Rincon De Susy and La Casa De Los Mariscos #2 LLC an unknown business entity d/b/a El Rincon De Susy
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cannon Bey et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 2:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Guzman, Robert Dyckman, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cannon:Bey, People of the United States of America Republic and Christopher Cannon Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC. v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2015cv01580
Defendant:
EL AGAVE ENTERPRISES INC. and ROSALIO SANCHEZ
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2012cv01645
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LAS FIESTAS, INC. and CARLOS SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2011cv01494
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MOCTEZUMA MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LLC and ELVIRA SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
MCDORMAN et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2008mc00050
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCDORMAN and JOSEPH PIEKIELKO
Defendant:
KEVIN SMITH, MICHAEL SANCHEZ, DANIEL MCDONALD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
