Other Statutes Cases
Loriann Anderson, et al v. Service Employees Internationa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35871
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELINDA WILTSE, as individuals and representatives of the respective requested classes, DENNIS RICHEY, LORIANN ANDERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHWEST SENIOR & DISABILITY SERVICES, a local intergovernmental agency, OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75, labor organization, JACKSON COUNTY, political subdivision of the State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff: KERRIN FISCUS
Elliott, et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 19-1182
Debtor: EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF PUERTO RICO, PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (PREPA) and PUERTO RICO HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Petitioner: CAPITULO DE JUBILADOS, (Retirees Chapter), CAPITULO INSTITUTO DE CULTURA PUERTORRIQUENA, (ICP Chapter), CAPITULO DE OFICINA DESARROLLO SOCIOECONOMICO Y COMUNITARIO, (ODSEC Chapter) and others
Interested Party: WHITEBOX MULTI-STRATEGY PARTNERS, L.P., AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, AUTONOMOUS MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE, (AMP) and others
Not Yet Classified: PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, Depository Trust Company, a/k/a Cofina, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Petitioner / Appellant: MARK ELLIOT, PETER C. HEIN, LAWRENCE B. DVORES and others
Trustee: MONSITA LECAROZ-ARRIBAS
3Rd Party Plaintiff: UBS TRUST COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO, SUCESION PASTOR MANDRY MERCADO, PUERTO RICO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor: PV PROPERTIES, INC.
Ashland Hospital Corporation v. Service Employees Internationa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASHLAND HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, (SEIU) District 1199 WV/KY/OH, JOHN DOE # 1 and JOHN DOE # 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?