Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Shaddy Whittaker
as 21-12123
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: In re: SHADDY WHITTAKER
Shaddy Whittaker v. Arnaldo Sanchez, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-13486
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY R. JOHNSON, Medical Doctor, Leesburg Regional Medical Center, ARNALDO SANCHEZ, D.O., FCC Coleman, D. IVEY, Nurse, FCC Coleman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHADDY WHITTAKER
In re: Shaddy Whittaker
as 16-13687
Petitioner: In re: SHADDY WHITTAKER
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Shaddy Whittaker
as 15-10635
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHADDY WHITTAKER
USA v. Shaddy Whittaker
as 14-15039
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHADDY WHITTAKER
USA v. Shaddy Whittaker
as 14-13494
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHADDY WHITTAKER
Timoteo Plancarte v. USDC-SAC
as 14-71663
: In re: TIMOTEO PLANCARTE
Petitioner: TIMOTEO PLANCARTE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: D. JORGE, GRIGGS, JOHN KRPAN and others
USA v. Shaddy Whittaker
as 13-13863
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHADDY WHITTAKER
Shaddy v. McElfish, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:1995cv00324
Defendant: Kristine Busher, Harold W. Clarke, John Dahm and others
Plaintiff: Philip Shaddy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Soderstrom v. USDC-CAC
as 09-72110
: In re: RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Petitioner: RANDY LEE SODERSTROM
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: TONY RACKAUCKAS, District Attorney, SHADDI KAMIABIPOUR, Deputy District Attorney, BOB MCDONELL, Chief of Police and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?