Cases 1 - 10 of 69
RUETER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02725
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL JAMES RUETER
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Zhou et al v. Napolitano et al
as 4:2010mc00097
Plaintiff:
Qiaoyun Zhou and B Wang
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas and Sharon Hudson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01717
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Zolfagharian v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2009mc00005
Petitioner:
Soheil Zolfagharian
Defendant:
Emilio Gonzalez, Sharon Hudson and Robert Mueller
Jin v. Mueller et al
as 4:2008cv03037
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Sharon Hudson, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Plaintiff:
Mingfeng Jin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USMANI v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv02984
Plaintiff:
MADIHA USMANI
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Villanueva v. Hudson et al
as 4:2008cv02876
Plaintiff:
Andres Villanueva
Defendant:
Sharon Hudson, Jonathan Scharfen, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Othman v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-20498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDAL OTHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EMILIO GONZALEZ, SHARON HUDSON and others
Ali, et al v. Hudson, et al
as 4:2008cv02298
Plaintiff:
Imran ALI and Sobia Hassan ALI
Defendant:
Sharon Hudson, Emilio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
