Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Marisela Urbina-Solorzano v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3070
Petitioner: MARISELA SILVANIA URBINA-SOLORZANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gutierrez Solorzano v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Jesus Manuel Gutierrez Solorzano
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Martinez-Castillo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4417
Petitioner: KATHERINE PAOLA MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, ANGEL SANTIAGO SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ, ANGEL GAEL SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06525
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Olmos Solorzano v. Garland
as 23-277
Petitioner: OMAR ALEJANDRO OLMOS SOLORZANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Linares Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-119
Petitioner: IRIS LINARES RAMOS and ROSSELYN SOLORZANO LINARES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez Solorzano, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1860
Petitioner: ALONDRA HERNANDEZ SOLORZANO, ASHLEY ALEJANDRA HERNANDEZ SOLORZANO and JONATHAN JESUS RAMIREZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dorrien v. CarLotz, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv09463
Plaintiff: Derek Dorrien
Defendant: CarLotz, Inc., Linda B. Abraham, Steven G. Carrel and others
Solorzano v. United States of America
as 22-1739
Petitioner: JULIO SOLORZANO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?