Cases 1 - 10 of 2,280
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-3659
Plaintiff:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor:
SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5156
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5159
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5101
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Amicus Curiae:
The Florida Chamber of Commerce, The Association of Florida Community Developers, Incorporated (AFCD), The Mosaic Company and others
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Mayes, et al.
as 24-3559
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF ARIZONA
Castillo Construction and Management, LLC et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Castillo Construction and Management, LLC, John Castillo and Southwest Elite Real Estate Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 24-3526
Defendant:
DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Merritt
as 24-3532
Defendant:
SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT and Susan Tennenbaum
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-3536
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant:
TROY NEWMAN and ALBIN RHOMBERG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
