Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant: Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United States of America v. State of California et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu: American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?