Cases 1 - 10 of 33
State of Wyoming v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Plaintiff:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
State of Wyoming v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv00193
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Director, Deb Haaland and others
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
American Wild Horse Campaign et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management Director et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Land Management Director, United States Department of Interior Secretary, Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Petitioner:
American Wild Horse Campaign, Animal Welfare Institute, Western Watershed Project and others
Intervenor:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service and others
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Consolidated Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack and United States Forest Service
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2021cv00056
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, Bureau of Land Management Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Acting Director and others
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae:
Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Western Energy Alliance v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Respondent:
United States of America President, United States Acting Secretary of Interior, Scott De La Vega and others
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance, Petroleum Association of Wyoming and State of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae:
Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00234
Intervenor Defendant:
SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, State of Wyoming, MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project and Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 0:2020cv00231
Intervenor Defendant:
MURDOCK LAND AND LIVESTOCK CO., SOMMERS RANCH, LLC, PRICE CATTLE RANCH and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, AURELIA SKIPWITH, DAVID L. BERNHARDT and others
Plaintiff:
YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
