Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Trump v. Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol et al
as 9:2022cv81758
Plaintiff:
Donald J Trump
Defendant:
Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Taylor Budowich, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Taylor Budowich
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Conservative Strategies, Inc., a California for profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol, Elizabeth Cheney, in her official capacity as a Member of the United States House of Representatives and others
In Re: NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
as 1:2022mc00060
In Re:
NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
Petitioner:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Respondent:
STEPHEN K. BANNON
NAVARRO v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv01519
Plaintiff:
PETER NAVARRO
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waldron v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Waldron
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Bennie G Thompson, Elizabeth L Cheney and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Bundren Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BUDOWICH et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv03366
Plaintiff:
Taylor Budowich and Conservative Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, Bennie Thompson, Elizabeth Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flynn v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
