Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Peterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03497
Defendant:
3M Company, Chemours Company, The and EIDP, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Sadeghi and Vicki Peterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Payne and Rebecca Payne v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03871
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Payne and Rebecca Payne
Anton Harb, Jr. v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03874
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Anton Harb, Jr.
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05509
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Detria Matthews
Earls et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05507
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Earls, John Giordano, Mauricio Rodriguez and others
Koffski et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05508
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Koffski, Joseph Ramirez, Edward Grunauer and others
Cottini et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05506
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cottini and Mary Cottini
Polk County v. 3M Company et al
as FLM/8:24-cv-01475
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, f/k/a United Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Polk County
West Prairie Village MHP LLC et al v. 3M Company et al
as WAE/2:24-cv-00203
Defendant:
3M Company, RTX Corporation, Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Co and others
Plaintiff:
West Prairie Village MHP LLC and Conwin Enterprises LLC
Karith Martin v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03459
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Karith Martin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.