Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MORLEY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY et al
as 2:2020cv04591
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, BRETT A BURROUGHS and Attorney General United States
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. MORLEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BIRDSBORO POWER LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2017cv05245
Plaintiff:
BIRDSBORO POWER LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604
SCHAEFFER v. STACKLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
SEAN SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
SEAN STACKLEY and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PALMER et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 2:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY PALMER and GEORGE PALMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
BATTLE v. MABUS et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
DAVID L BATTLE
Defendant:
RAY MABUS and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
FARMER v. MABUS et al
as 2:2016cv01830
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. FARMER
Defendant:
RAY MABUS and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GIOVANNI et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
as 2:2016cv04873
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI, DOROTHY PALMER, GEORGE PALMER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
FARMER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 2:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LIPPL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 2:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. LIPPL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
USS FORREST SHERMAN DD-931 FOUNDATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2010cv02174
Plaintiff:
USS FORREST SHERMAN DD-931 FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, RAY MABUS and THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 470 (f) National Historic Preservation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
