Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timothy King v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 22-1010
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING
Interested Party:
STEFANIE LYNN JUNTTILA
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Timothy King v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 21-1785
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING, et al.
Interested Party:
L. LIN WOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Timothy King v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 21-1786
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING, et al.
Interested Party:
GREGORY J ROHL, BRANDON JOHNSON, HOWARD KLEINHENDLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Timothy King v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 21-1787
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KING, et al.
Interested Party:
EMILY NEWMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Timothy King, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-2205
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and MICHIGAN BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RITCHARD, JAMES HOOPER, MARIAN SHERIDAN and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
King et al v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2020cv13134
Plaintiff:
Daren Rubingh, Charles Ritchard, Timothy King and others
Defendant:
Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Jocelyn Benson, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, City of Detroit, Michigan Democratic Party and others
Amicus Curiae:
Michigan State Conference NAACP
Interested Party:
Scott Hagerstrom, Julia Haller, Brandon Johnson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
