Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Bay Area Unitarian v. Ogg
as 23-20165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church, Drink Houston Better, L.L.C., doing business as Antidote Coffee and Perk You Later, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Webster Acting Chief Pete Bacon and others
Harper v. City of Houston Police
as 23-20138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department and State of Texas
Incorrectly Filed vs Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Carrio and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Houston Police Department and Harris County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Harper v. City of Houston Police
as 22-20526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department and State of Texas
Harper v. Houston Police Dept
as 22-20486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department and State of Texas
Harper v. Houston Police Dept
as 22-20445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department and State of Texas
Harper v. Houston Police Dept
as 22-20367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department and State of Texas
Charles Caston v. Houston Police Department, et al
as 21-17086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD J. TRUMP, MARK ZUCKERBERG and others
Harper v. Houston Police Dept
as 21-20423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell J. Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston Police Department
Stephens v. City of Houston
as 21-20350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Augustus Stephens
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston, Houston Police Department and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
