Cases 1 - 10 of 1,755
Dechaun ToliverIn re: Dechaun Toliver
as 24-3521
Petitioner:
In re: DECHAUN TOLIVER
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Choi v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv04455
Plaintiff:
Tim Choi
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Continental Resources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Padres Unidos de Tulsa et al v. Drummond et al
as 5:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Padres Unidos de Tulsa and Ximena Monserrat Lopez Mena
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Tim Tipton, Vicki Behenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Shanishchara v. Model N, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02994
Plaintiff:
Kunal Shanishchara
Defendant:
Model N, Inc., Baljit Dail, Tim Adams and others
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Coleman v. County of Shasta, et al.
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. COLEMAN, IV
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SHASTA, a Municipal Corporation, SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TIM ESTES, a Shasta County Sheriff Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
