Cases 1 - 10 of 10
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc01404
Plaintiff:
JACK SNIADO, ARVIND SUNDAR, MICHAEL KROMAR and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, FREDERICK ISAACSON, AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
In Re:
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Undetermined:
INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
W & T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC v. PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
W & T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC. and AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
W&T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC v. PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv01617
Plaintiff:
W & T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STEIN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01384
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY STEIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC. , AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK and AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KUNU v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01252
Plaintiff:
AMAVI KUNU
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC. , AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK and AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANEKE v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANEKE
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK and AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC. v. W&T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2010cv01873
Plaintiff:
PRIORITY ONE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
W&T TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL ("ECDET") et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2006cv01215
Plaintiff:
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, WAYNE S. SMITH and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES TREASURY OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
In Re FANNIE MAE SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2004cv01639
Defendant:
DANIEL H. MUDD, J.TIMOTHY HOWARD, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Interested Party:
MCSLARROW CONSULTING LLC, MILLER, HAMILTON, SNIDER & ODOM, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Petitioner:
COMINVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, SCHERTLER & ONORATO, STATMAN. HARRIS & EYRICH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
INSTITUTIONAL FIDUCIARY TRUST, FRANKLIN FLEX CAP GROWTH CORPORATE CLASS, FRANKLIN CUSTODIAN FUNDS, INC. and others
In Re:
FANNIE MAE SECURITIES LITIGATION
Cross Claimant:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor Defendant:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PNEUMO ABEX CORP., et al v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO, et al
as 1:1982cv02098
Defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP , TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
Third_party_defendant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. , NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. , NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY , NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. and others
Plaintiff:
PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION
Movant:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor_plaintiff:
WHITMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
