Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shaw v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01996
Plaintiff:
Van Shaw
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Rene G. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tanali Family Trust v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00154
Defendant:
Tanali Family Trust and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers Compensation et al
as 3:2021cv02216
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers Compensation, Fleming Foods, Raymond Forklift Trucks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Falick v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 4:2021cv02441
Plaintiff:
Michael Falick
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
as 4:2017mc01804
Plaintiff:
Marcus W. Ray
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc.
Johnson v. United Parcel Services DO NOT DOCKET. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN CIVIL CASE #2:16cv311.
as 2:2016mc00676
Petitioner:
Elisha M Johnson
Respondent:
United Parcel Services
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carter v. United Parcel Service, Inc
as 3:2013cv02802
Plaintiff:
Kouri Carter
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Discrimination Against Persons Who Serve in the Uniformed Services
Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2012mc00051
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Via Viente Taiwan, LP
as 3:2010mc00070
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Via Viente Taiwan, LP
Hernandez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00427
Plaintiff:
Josefina Hernandez and Josefina Hernandez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
