Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Chavez et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09577
Petitioner:
Valeria Chavez, Erik Esparza, Jamar Smith and others
Respondent:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Uber Technologies, Inc. et al v. Murphy et al
as 1:2020cv00463
Plaintiff:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA, LLC
Defendant:
Jimmy Porter, James Porter, Monica Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
S. Mendel v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-17380
Defendant / Appellee:
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C., a law firm, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Adminisrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified:
MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner:
S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court:
In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70357
Undetermined:
RAISER, LLC, RAISER-CA LLC, UBER USA, LLC and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Other:
In re: DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv07440
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SC Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv05546
Defendant:
UATC, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Diva Limousine, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Martin POSH ENTERPRISES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Archie Overton, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 18-16610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC, UBER USA, LLC and others
Archie Overton, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 18-71321
:
In re: ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Petitioner:
ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC and UBER USA, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
