Cases 1 - 10 of 5,159
Marin v. Catano, et al.
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
KRISTINE CATANO, in their official and personal capacity, ADELA DE LA TORRE, in their official and personal capacity, VANESSA RUIZ, in their official and personal capacity and others
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Scott v. State Bar of Arizona, et al.
as 24-3098
Plaintiff:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT, II
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, ARKANSAS BAR ASSOCIATION and ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
District Hospital Partners, L.P., et al v. NLRB
as 24-1134
Petitioner:
District Hospital Partners, L.P., d/b/a George Washington University Hospital, A Limited Partnership and UHS of D.C., Inc., General Partner
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Chaarawi v. Gonzalez, et al.
as 24-3073
Defendant:
SHARMIR GONZALEZ, Shamir Gonzalez, MARCUS ENSIEDJIAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALID M. CHAARAWI
United States of America v. Case
as 24-1294
Defendant:
MARY A. OSGOOD, ROBERT V. CASE, JUBILEE ENTERPRISES and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Agensys, Inc. v. The Regents of The University of California et al
as 2:2024cv03961
Plaintiff:
Agensys, Inc.
Defendant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation, Norbert Peekhaus and Hans David Ulmert
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Pena v. Oregon Health And Science University
as 24-3041
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE PENA
Defendant:
OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
Spatz v. Regents of the University of California
as 24-2997
Plaintiff:
JORDAN SPATZ, M.D.
Defendant:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
