Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 468
USA v. Lopez-Villegas
as 24-10736
Defendant: Brandon Lopez-Villegas
Plaintiff: United States of America
Leal v. Adamson, et al.
as 24-4594
Defendant: TERENCE AGUSTIN, MARTIN NAUGHTON, CARLOS CALDERON and others
Plaintiff: JACK LEAL
United States of America v. Diaz Morales (Orlando Hernandez)
as 24-1891
Defendant: MAURICIO HERNANDEZ PINEDA, RONALD ENRIQUE SALGUERO PORTILLO, Ronald Salguero and others
: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Diaz Morales (Hernandez Pineda)
as 24-1868
Defendant: JOH, Don Amado, Tony Hernandez and others
: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Santos v. Annikos, et al.
as 24-3730
Plaintiff: RONALD R. SANTOS
Defendant: KENNETH ANNIKOS, JOSEPH BENSON, N. BRITENBACK and others
Villegas-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3673
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN VILLEGAS-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD. et al v. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv21926
Respondent: AXIS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC, CARLOS ENRIQUE WILLIAMSON NASI, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP and others
Unknown: ORO NEGRO DECUS PTE. LTD.,, ORO NEGRO IMPETUS PTE. LTD, ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD. et al v. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP et al
as 1:2024mc21926
Petitioner: ORO NEGRO PRIMUS PTE. LTD., ORO NEGRO LAURUS PTE. LTD., ORO NEGRO FORTIUS PTE. LTD., and others
Respondent: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, GONZALO GIL WHITE, JOSE ANTONIO CAEDO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Pina-Albino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2606
Petitioner: SANDRA PINA-ALBINO and GIANELLA LUCIA VILLEGAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Villegas et al
as 1:2024cv00962
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Tom Villegas and Amy Villegas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?