Other Statutes Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02911
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dowding v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2021cv01345
Defendant: Ranay Sommerville, David M. Webb, Verizon and others
Plaintiff: Michael Dowding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03153
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03153
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum to Verizon Wireless
as 8:2019cv02120
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner: JOSEPH GHATTAS
Plaintiff: Paul Mack, Danita Ingram, Thomas Boone and others
Defendant: Mark A. Magaw, Major Kathleen Mills, Christopher Murtha and others
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum to Verizon Wireless
as 8:2019cv02119
Petitioner: William Alexander
In Re: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Plaintiff: Paul Mack, Danita Ingram, Thomas Boone and others
Defendant: Mark A. Magaw, Major Kathleen Mills, Christopher Murtha and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?