Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Oscar Perez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70033
Petitioner: OSCAR ALDREDO PEREZ, AKA Leonel Victor Mendez
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Oscar Perez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72735
Petitioner: OSCAR ALDREDO PEREZ, AKA Leonel Victor Mendez
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Detroit International Bridge, et al v. Government of Canada, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5270
Plaintiff - Appellant: Detroit International Bridge Company, a Michigan corporation and Canadian Transit Company, a Canadian special act corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Government of Canada, Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration and others
1000 Friends of Wisconsin, Inc v. Wisconsin Department of Trans, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2586
Plaintiff - Appellee: 1000 FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and MARK GOTTLIEB
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
1000 Friends of Wisconsin, Inc v. Wisconsin Department of Trans, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2321
Plaintiff - Appellee: 1000 FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARK GOTTLIEB and DAVE ROSS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
Conservation Alliance of St L, et al v. U.S. Department of Transportat, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15791
Plaintiff - Appellant: CONSERVATION ALLIANCE OF ST LUCIE COUNTY, INC., a Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation and TREASURE COAST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, a.k.a. Indian Riverkeeper
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
: SERVICE
Committee of 100 v. Anthony Foxx, et al
as 15-5112
Plaintiff - Appellant: Committee of 100 on the Federal City
Defendant - Appellee: Anthony Foxx, Secretary of Transportation, Victor Mendez, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Gina McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Detroit International Bridge, et al v. Government of Canada, et al
as 15-5086
Plaintiff - Appellant: Detroit International Bridge Company, a Michigan corporation and Canadian Transit Company, a Canadian special act corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Government of Canada, Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration and others
Citizens for Appropriate Rural, et al v. Anthony Foxx, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1554
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, WILLIAM A. BOYD, JANICE A. BOYD and others
Defendant - Appellee: RAYMOND H. LAHOOD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, MICHAEL B. CLINE, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Transportation, ROBERT F. TALLY, in his official capacity as the Division Administrator--Indiana Division of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant: PORTSMOUTH, RI
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL P. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DANIEL J. BERMAN, in his official capacity as Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Interested Party: BRISTOL, RI and TIVERTON, RI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?