Cases 1 - 10 of 266
Jerome Johnson v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-5128
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, U.S. Department of Navy
Johnson v. Commonwealth Hospitality LLC
as 24-2454
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH HOSPITALITY LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Robbins
as 23-1332
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Tina Robbins, Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Samantha Blaisdell and others
Johnson v. Trump
as 23-1276
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Allen v. US
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE E. ALLEN, JOSEPH E. ARMSTEAD, LAWRENCE C. BECKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01361
Not Classified By Court:
SECRETARY CARLOS DEL TORO and JEROME W. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
JOHNSON v. DEL TORO
as 1:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
JEROME W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
In re: Steven Crittenden, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILBERT HENRY LEE, LACEDRIC W. JOHNSON, ROBERT LEE COLE, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
