Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Gould v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Gould
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden William Gittere and William Reubart
Jeremy Gallant v. Ronald Erdos, et al
as 21-4134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY P. GALLANT
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD ERDOS, Warden, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM COOL, CAPTAIN COLE DISTEL and others
James Malarik v. Beaver County Jail, et al
as 21-3172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY JAIL, ADMINISTRATION, WARDEN WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, DEPUTY WARDEN ETHEL WHITE and others
Ronald Williams v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-16367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Offender Management Dept. and SHELLY WILLIAMS, Records Specialist/Program Officer IV
James Malarik v. Beaver County Jail, et al
as 21-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. LUKEASHA TYSON, SGT. M. CAMPBELL, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Ronald Williams v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-15795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Offender Management Dept.
Bridges v. Lee
as 21-804
Petitioner / Appellant:
Isaiah Bridges
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden William Lee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
