Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Sposato v. Ryan
as 24-536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPOSATO
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. RYAN, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL G. CAREY, -, individually and in his official capacity, JED HUDSON, individually and in his official capacity and others
Golden v. Gagne
as 24-322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK GOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GAGNE, Field Investigator
Defendant:
TIMOTHY FURLONG, Regional Director, Det. WILLIAM ROOT, Onondaga County Sherrif's Department, WILLIAM FITZPATRICK and others
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hillary v. St. Lawrence County
as 21-2534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oral Nicholas Hillary
Defendant / Appellee:
Village of Potsdam, Village of Potsdam Police Department, Unidentified Jane and John Doe Village of Potsdam Employees 31-40 and others
Defendant:
St. Lawrence County, St. Lawrence County District Attorney's Office, Mary E. Rain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
