Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kettle Range Conservation Group v. US Forest Service et al
as 2:2021cv00161
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Regional Forester Glenn Casamassa, Forest Supervisor Rodney Smoldon and others
Plaintiff:
Kettle Range Conservation Group
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551
Green World Council Bluffs LLC et al v. 1Sharpe Opportunity Intermediate Fund LP et al
as 2:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Travis Masters, Derrick Land, Churchill Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim and Green World Council Bluffs LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Travis Dean Dailey
as 2:2018rd00065
Defendant:
Travis Dean Dailey
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Beneficial Life Insurance Company v. Beaird et al
as 2:2016mc00144
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aaron Travis Beaird and Team Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. Genesis Credit Management
as 1:2015cv03193
Plaintiff:
Travis G Miller
Defendant:
Genesis Credit Management
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schoepfer v. Midland Credit Management Inc
as 2:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Travis J Schoepfer
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brock v. Army et al
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Travis L Brock
Defendant:
US Department of Army and Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
