Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-180
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN CHADWICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, MARKUS FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CATHERINE MCKOY, Individually
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Intervenor:
RAJ K. PATEL
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-181
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Loretta Williams v. What If Holdings, LLC, et al
as 23-15337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORETTA WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
WHAT IF HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA C4R Media Corp. and ACTIVEPROSPECT INC.
Lee v. Binance
as 22-972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JD Anderson, Corey Hardin, Eric Lee, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Binance and Changpeng Zhao
Defendant:
Yi He and Roger Wang
Cecilia Webb, et al v. The City of Maplewood
as 21-8012
Respondent:
Cecelia Roberts Webb, Darron Yates, Anthony Lemicy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Eutz and Krystal Banks
Petitioner:
City of Maplewood
Penn National Gaming, Inc. v. Gina Lipari-Williams, et al
as 21-8011
Respondent:
Gina R. Lipari-Williams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marissa T. Hammond and Lucinda M. Layton
Defendant:
Missouri Gaming Company, LLC, doing business as Argosy Riverside Casino and St. Louis Gaming Ventures, LLC, doing business as Hollywood Casino, St. Louis
Petitioner:
Penn National Gaming, Inc.
Lizzie Davis, et al v. Oasis Legal Finance Operating, et al
as 20-11364
Defendant / Appellee:
THL CREDIT, INC., OASIS LEGAL FINANCE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, OASIS LEGAL FINANCE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIRLEY WILLIAMS, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, PAMELA DAVIS, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, JOHN SUBER, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated and others
Wynn v. Union Local 237, I.B.T
as 19-962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Wynn, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kevin Fulton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jose Otero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Union Local 237, I.B.T
In re: State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 19-503
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES
Petitioner:
In re: STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Respondent:
DON WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and SUSAN HICKS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
