Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williamson v. Schmoll
as 1:2017mc00039
Petitioner:
Brett J Williamson
Respondent:
Robert Schmoll
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
COOPER et al v. VAUGHT et al
as 1:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY and CRAIG COOPER
Defendant:
JENNIFER K BARTEK, GREGORY A. BERGER, MARA CATEY-WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00642
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JB WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Holland et al v. The City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland and The Law Firm of Robert Holland
Defendant:
The City of Gary , Rudy Clay , Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary City of, Scott King, Hamilton Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILLIAMSON et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 1:2003cv01456
Plaintiff:
AFEWERKI ABEBE, ODEY AGI, MALCOLM BELFROM, JR. and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS-DISTRICT LODGE 141-M and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Claimant:
MICHAEL M OLSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
