Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jiang v. BlueCity Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2021cv04044
Plaintiff:
Junhui Jiang
Defendant:
BlueCity Holdings Limited, Baoli Ma, Zhiyong Li and others
Petitioner:
Shiyuan Zhu, Hui Yan Huang and Patrick Van der Schueren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Huang v. Coven
as 1:2018cv01943
Plaintiff:
Feng Yan Huang
Defendant:
Phyllis Coven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xiu Huang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71987
Petitioner:
XIU YAN HUANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jeffrey Grodko v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grodko
Defendant:
Lihua International Inc., Jianhua Zhu and Daphne Yan Huang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ashish Anand v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05037
Lead Plaintiff:
James Holtz
Plaintiff:
Ashish Anand, Peter Hoang and Beverly Burks
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grodko
Petitioner:
Shawn Hart and Robert B. Dreisin
Defendant:
Lihua International Inc., Jianhua Zhu, Daphne Yan Huang and others
Not Yet Classified:
Philip Cafaro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jeffrey Grodko v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03503
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grodko
Defendant:
Daphne Yan Huang, Lihua International Inc. and Jianhua Zhu
Anand v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03393
Movant:
Ashish Anand
Defendant:
Daphne Yan Huang, Lihua International Inc. and Jianhua Zhu
Ashish Anand v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03381
Plaintiff:
Ashish Anand
Defendant:
Daphne Yan Huang, Lihua International Inc. and Jianhua Zhu
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
