Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
POWELL v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02503
Defendant:
BALBOA INSURANCE GROUP, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., DITECH SERVICING and others
Plaintiff:
EVERETT POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent:
Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re:
Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
