Cases 1 - 10 of 51
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gilzian LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Gilzian LLC t/a Sizzle et al., Jarnail Singh and Gilzian LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Cordova v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A CORDOVA and Robert A. Cordova
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, FRANK KENDALL, III, Air Force Board For Correction of Military Records and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ghias et al v. Sirnaomics, Inc., et al
as 8:2022cv02808
Plaintiff:
Mike Ghias and Ashgar Ghias
Defendant:
Sirnaomics, Inc., et al, Sirnaomics, Inc. and Sirnaomics LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Evan Randall Huggins, Tr. v. Roundpoint Mort. Serv. Corp., et al.
as 1:2022cv02246
Plaintiff:
Evan Randall Huggins, Tr.
Defendant:
RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, and Roundpoint Mort. Serv. Corp., et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Joseph Bunce
as 8:2019cv03084
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
Petitioner:
Detective Joseph Bunce
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Scott Finn
as 8:2019cv03083
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
Petitioner:
Scott Finn
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Daniel Smith
as 8:2019cv03081
Petitioner:
Daniel Smith
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum as to Chris Long
as 8:2019cv03082
Respondent:
HNLEA NCR, et al.
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum
Petitioner:
Chris Long
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
