Cases 11 - 20 of 49
USA v. Stiltner et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Mary F. Stiltner and Unknown Spouse of Mary F. Stiltner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Bocock et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ashley F. Bocock, Brett T. Bocock and Capital One Bank (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Gordon et al
as 5:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Teresa Gordon, Steve Gordon, Lonnie Douglas Riddell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lagrew v. Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey F. Lagrew
Defendant:
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts v. Wethington et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roberts and Carol Roberts
Defendant:
Wethington, James Wethington, Robert S. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Byrd v. Louisville Gas & Electric
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
David F. Byrd
Defendant:
Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byrd v. Louisville Gas & Electric
as 1:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
David F. Byrd and Jo Anna Byrd
Defendant:
Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Elam et al
as 0:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles F. Elam, Unknown Spouse of Charles F. Elam , Danny R. Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
City of Earlington, KY v. Copeland et al
as 4:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
City of Earlington, KY
Defendant:
Horace L. Copeland, Sr., Christine C. Copeland, Horace L. Copeland, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fo
City of Earlington, KY v. Copeland et al
as 5:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
City of Earlington, Kentucky
Defendant:
Horace L. Copeland, Sr., Christine C. Copeland, Horace L. Copeland, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
