Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 7:2023cv02678
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority and Quaker Hill Estates Water System
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
The Secretary of The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. The Estate of Lillian Carmody aka Lillian M. Carmody, deceased et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The Secretary of The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
The Estate of Lillian Carmody aka Lillian M. Carmody, deceased, Robert Golambos and Betsy Froehling, Trustees of the Irrevocable Trust Agreement of Lillian M. Carmody, under an agreement dated October 18, 2011, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
The Estate of Xavier Veliz et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF XAVIER VELIZ, R. D. VELIZ, XAVIER K. VELIZ and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a MR. COOPER and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased et al
as 1:2022cv07925
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York City Environmental Control Board; and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
Fried v. CIT Bank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv07376
Plaintiff:
Aron, as Trustee of the Seiden Family Estate Trust Fried
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator et al
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, United States of America o/b/o Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
T.E.S Corporation v. Viamgar Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
T.E.S Corporation doing business as New Process Cleaners
Defendant:
Viamgar Ventures, Inc., Gavin Ragusa and Gavin Ragusa as Executor of the Estate of Victor J. Ragusa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 - Cause of Action Arising under CERCLA
Mae v. Quickway Estates LLC et al
as 7:2022cv03048
Defendant:
Quickway Estates LLC, Jacob Grunhut, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE and others
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Receiver:
Harvey L. Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Papapietro v. Clott et al
as 1:2022cv01318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papapietro
Defendant:
Michael Howard Clott, Bjorn Koritz, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) LTD v. McEachern et al
as 1:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) LTD
Defendant:
James McEachern, The Estate of Ruth Walfor, Karina Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
