Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Vision Bank v. Bama Bayou, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Vision Bank
Defendant:
Bama Bayou, LLC , Mitchell Company, Inc. , Gulf World, LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
State Bank and Trust Company , West Alabama Bank & Trust , Park National Corporation and others
Intervenor:
FDIC
Counter_claimant:
Charles Trammell , Belinda Trammell , George S. Braswell and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Cahaba Forests, LLC v. Hay et al
as 3:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Cahaba Forests, LLC
Defendant:
Mary George East Hay, Doris East Ragsdale, Lynda Marie East Rice Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
George v. BAC Home Lending Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00546
Plaintiff:
Kimberley George
Defendant:
BAC Home Lending Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Transocean, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
George C. Simpson
Defendant:
Transocean, Ltd., BP, PLC, Transocean, Ltd. (Transocean Entity) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company a/s/o Virginia Hunnicutt v. Hunnicutt et al
as 7:2009cv01702
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company a/s/o Virginia Hunnicutt and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company a/s/o Virginia Hunnicutt
Defendant:
George Hunnicutt and Terri Hunnicutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
United States of America v. Land, Pickens County et al
as 7:2008cv01381
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Land, Pickens County and George . Ballard
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Abrams et al v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, Sr., Cleveland Abrams, Sr., Adell M. Adams and others
Defendant:
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp., Ciba-Geigy Corp., Novartis, Ltd., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
