Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Grabill Bank v. Kelly & Cathy LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Grabill Bank
Defendant:
Kelly & Cathy LLC, Custom Golf of New Haven Inc, Kelly A Mettert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
JOHNSON CREAMERY, LLC v. NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
as 1:2008cv01568
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON CREAMERY, LLC and JOHNSON CREAMERY, LLC
Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY LOAN TRUST 2006-NC2 v. MOORE et al
as 1:2008cv01336
Plaintiff:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY LOAN TRUST 2006-NC2
Defendant:
GARY R. MOORE, RITA MOORE, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC v. Z.K. DIGS, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
NTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
Z.K. DIGS, INC., STEVEN R. GOAD, OPTION ONE MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Charter Schools Development Corporation v. East Chicago City of et al
as 2:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Charter Schools Development Corporation and Charter Schools Development Corporation
Defendant:
East Chicago City of, Revitalization Organization of New Addition Inc The and School City of East Chicago The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. SPRIGLER et al
as 4:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
EDWARD ALLEN SPRIGLER, EMILY JANE SPRIGLER, GEORGE E. SPRIGLER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NEW FASHION PORK LLP et al v. OMNI BUILDERS INC et al
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
NEW FASHION PORK LLP and THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
OMNI BUILDERS INC, SIGNET BUILDERS INC and SIGNET CONSTRUCTION OF TEXAS INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
