Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Essex Bunker Hill, LP v. Cierra Eileen Brooks et al
as 2:2022cv06773
Plaintiff:
Essex Bunker Hill, LP
Defendant:
Cierra Eileen Brooks, Edward Robinski and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Prime Playa LLC v. Jeffery Hill et al
as 2:2022cv04331
Plaintiff:
Prime Playa LLC
Defendant:
Jeffery Hill and Does 1-25 Inclusive
Fox Hills Canterbury Company LP v. Mark Covington et al
as 2:2022cv02458
Plaintiff:
Fox Hills Canterbury Company LP
Defendant:
Mark Covington and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fox Hills Canterbury Company LP v. Mark Covington et al.
as 2:2022cv02168
Plaintiff:
Fox Hills Canterbury Company LP
Defendant:
Mark Covington, Denise Buchanon and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
FC Broadway and Hill v. Rachel Holmes et al
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
FC Broadway and Hill
Defendant:
Rachel Holmes and DOES 1 to 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Onni South Hill, LP v. Louis Angel et al
as 2:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Onni South Hill, LP
Defendant:
Louis Angel and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
Einar WM. Johnson v. Tod Frueh et al
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Einar WM. Johnson doing business as Rolling Hills Properties
Defendant:
Tod Frueh
Missions at Chino Hills, LP v. Andre Chapple et al
as 5:2021cv01621
Plaintiff:
Missions at Chino Hills, LP
Defendant:
Andrew Chapple and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
Kraft v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2021cv00768
Defendant:
Kings County, Roland P. Hill, Tulare County and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judith Karmon v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv02023
Defendant:
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C., Vanderbilt Minerals LLC, ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Judith Karmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
