Cases 31 - 40 of 85
United States of America v. Yang, Kao et al
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Kao Yang and Li Zhang
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
John A. Thymes et al v. Steven P. Chang et al
as 5:2020cv00261
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Law Offices of Steven P. Chang, Houling Chen and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes and Luevina Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Li et al v. Lewis
as 1:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
You Li, Roland Li, Larry Lewis and others
Interpleader:
Internal Revenue Service and USA
Defendant:
Jack Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Li Wang v. Roberto D. Rangel et al
as 5:2019cv02221
Defendant:
Roberto D. Rangel, DOES 1 to 10 inclusive, Tammy Lee Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Li Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
(UD)(PS)Li v. Duncan
as 2:2019cv02256
Plaintiff:
Samuel Li
Defendant:
Theresa M Duncan and Theresa M. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
CHEN et al v. UNION MARKET APARTMENTS LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
POTOMAC ABATEMENT, INC., UNION MARKET APARTMENTS LLC and 1250 4TH ST (EDENS), LLC
Plaintiff:
YING-LI YU, YING-CAI CHEN and SUNLIGHT TRADING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rui Qun Li v. Xinghuan Situ et al
as 2:2018cv08900
Plaintiff:
Rui Qun Li
Defendant:
Xinghuan Situ and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Li v. Davis
as 1:2018cv04287
Plaintiff:
Yinqn Li
Defendant:
Kyrima Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Li et al v. Solo et al
as 1:2018cv03846
Defendant:
Jeff Solo and Lydia Solo
Plaintiff:
Zhongju Li and Lidong Zhang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
He et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) et al
as 5:2018cv04659
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Li Rong Liang and Jian Jun He
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
