Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.51 Acres, More or Less, in Nelson County, Virginia, Located on Parcel Identification No. 33-A-33A, Described in That Certain Deed Recorded in DB 313, Page 800 Among the Land Records of Nelson County et al
as 3:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Jill M. Willson and 1.51 Acres, More or Less, in Nelson County, Virginia, Located on Parcel Identification No. 33-A-33A, Described in That Certain Deed Recorded in DB 313, Page 800 Among the Land Records of Nelson County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Per Em Heru Express Trust v. Mortgage Amenities Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Per Em Heru Express Trust
Defendant:
Mortgage Amenities Corporation, M & T Bank and Government National Mortgage Association as Trustee for Securitized Trust Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2001-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Magee et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
D. Scott Magee , Tracey M. Pratt and Halley G. Magee
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Dallas Granville Magee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown-El v. Seterus, Inc., et al et al
as 2:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Dawne Brown-El
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc., et al, The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) et al, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. aka ("MERS") et al and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.19 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0340000001810, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 1 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK B, BLOCK D, et al
as 2:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.19 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0340000001810, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 1 OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK B, BLOCK D, et al and Thomas M. Tye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.06 Acre, More or Less, In Nottoway County, Virginia, Located on Parcel Identification No. 20-7 et al
as 3:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.06 Acre, More or Less, In Nottoway County, Virginia, Located on Parcel Identification No. 20-7, Harold Edward Foster, Jr., Viola M. Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.03 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0343013000180, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 18 OF FOREST COVE, SECTION ONE, AS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT...et al
as 2:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.03 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, LOCATED ON PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 0343013000180, IDENTIFIED AS LOT 18 OF FOREST COVE, SECTION ONE, AS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT... et al, Robin M. Haynes and Wilhelmine Haynes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Manzaneda v. Duenas et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Carmen M. Manzaneda
Defendant:
Aida Duenas and Joseph Luis Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cromer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00843
Plaintiff:
Deborah M. Cromer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Equifax Information Services, LLP, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Deborah M. Cromer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Giles County, Craig County, Montgomery County, Roanoke County, Franklin County, and Pittsylvania County, Vir et al
as 7:2017cv00492
Defendant:
1.97 Acres of Land, Owned by Keith M. Wilson and Mary K. Wilson, 3.76 Acres of Land, Owned by Catherine Beckner Kingery, 2.05 Acres of Land, Owned by Howard M. Thompson and Christine W. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Tammy Belinsky and Daniel Breslau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
