Cases 31 - 37 of 37
NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC v. HIATT et al
as 1:2009cv01303
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN E. HIATT, AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK v. OGILVIE et al
as 1:2008cv01741
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
AMY R. OGILVIE, APEX CAPITAL, LTD., FIDELITY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC v. Z.K. DIGS, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
NTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
Z.K. DIGS, INC., STEVEN R. GOAD, OPTION ONE MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. 123.62 ACRES et al
as 1:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and others
Defendant:
123.62 ACRES, WILLIAM HARVEY HEGARTY, CONSTANCE BOYD HEGARTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VASH et al v. ESTATE OF EUGENE GORDON BYSAROVICH et al
as 3:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH S. VASH and GEORGE K. VASH
Defendant:
ESTATE OF EUGENE GORDON BYSAROVICH, STATE OF INDIANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
G & L PARTNERSHIP et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
G & L PARTNERSHIP and MARK R. RAMSEY
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC v. DUNCAN et al
as 1:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL CITY REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
DENNIS E. DUNCAN, SR., DENISE DUNCAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
