Cases 41 - 50 of 51
United States of America v. Nails et al
as 4:2008cv01529
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leshia C Nails, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Martin
as 5:2007cv02841
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Helen C Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Waddell et al
as 7:2007cv02834
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Julia McElmurray Waddell, Tyson H Waddell, Cooley's Landing Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Collins et al
as 1:2007cv01374
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
L C Collins, Polly C Sanders, S C Heart Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Sterling et al
as 9:2007cv01025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lydia Roberta Sterling, Deron C Brantley, TranSouth Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Malone
as 2:2007cv00936
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cheryl C Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Powell et al
as 4:2007cv00882
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terence C Powell and Stefanie J Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Blackmon et al
as 0:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bobby L Blackmon, Jr, Amanda C Blackmon, Williams Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Lewis et al
as 0:2007cv00556
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brenda B Lewis, Cheryl Lewis, Robert H Lewis, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Kirk
as 5:2007cv00280
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ernest Lee Kirk, Jr and Karen C Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
