Cases 51 - 60 of 61
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. MELNICK et al
as 3:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
MICHAEL F. MELNICK, SR., .033 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DOLORES A. MELNICK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. 5.75 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
5.75 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID L. BEEGLE and JULIA A. BEEGLE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. 0.50 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
0.50 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD J. SAKALAUSKAS and EMILIJA SAKALAUSKAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. 0.592 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
0.592 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PAUL J. JUERGENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. 0.60 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
0.60 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES E. MORGAN and ROSE M. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 164.52 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
164.52 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PINE OAKS LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 275 Condemnation (Eminent Domain)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.85 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN WESTMORELAND COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND ESTATE O URSOLA RIPEPI, ET AL.,
as 2:2008cv00264
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.85 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN WESTMORELAND COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND ESTATE O URSOLA RIPEPI, ET AL.,
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 275 Condemnation (Eminent Domain)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.87 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ARMSTRONG COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv00993
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.87 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ARMSTRONG COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ALAN L. SUMMERHILL
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 275 Condemnation (Eminent Domain)
TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR DOLLARS ($28,004.00) v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR DOLLARS ($28,004.00)
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and OFFICE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
TWO (2) MOTOR VEHICLES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
TWO (2) MOTOR VEHICLES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
