Cases 81 - 90 of 332
Kitron v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Kitron
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and JC Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hayon et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2013cv12280
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Hayon and Rhonda Hayon
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Thompson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 2:2013cv11990
Plaintiff:
Gary Thompson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Burley et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
Steven Burley and Michelle Burley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mansour et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2013cv11862
Plaintiff:
Hassib Mansour and Ghada Mansour
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Chase Bank
Harris v. FDIC et al
as 2:2013cv11721
Plaintiff:
Antonio Harris
Defendant:
FDIC, JP Morgan Chase & Co. , Marshall Isaacs and others
Bartolomeo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2013cv11616
Plaintiff:
Dawn Bartolomeo
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Hill et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 2:2013cv11469
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill and Jacqueline Hill
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Hedler v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv11374
Plaintiff:
William D Hedler
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Unknown Trustee, as Trustee of the asset-backed security in which the loan at issue was pooled and UNKNOWN HOLDERS, the unknown holders of said asset-backed security
Mullen v. J.P. Morgan Chase
as 1:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
Romie L. Mullen
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
