Cases 1 - 6 of 6
FTF Lending LLC v. 594 East 7th Street LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10784
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Defendant:
594 East 7th Street LLC, Thomas F Meade, Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTF Lending LLC v. 614 East 7th Street LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10768
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Cross Defendant:
614 East 7th Street LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Thomas F Meade, IV
Defendant:
Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston, Peter Russell, John Does 1-10 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTF Lending, LLC v. 746 East 4th Street LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10765
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending, LLC
Cross Defendant:
746 East 4th Street LLC
Defendant:
Thomas F Meade, Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston, John Does 1-10 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTF Lending LLC v. 596 EAST 7TH STREET LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10764
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Defendant:
596 EAST 7TH STREET LLC, Thomas F Meade, Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTF Lending LLC v. 603 DOT AVE LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10677
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Defendant:
603 DOT AVE LLC, Thomas Meade, Collector-Treasurer, City of Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
FTF Lending LLC v. TCP 595 E 7th LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10665
Plaintiff:
FTF Lending LLC
Cross Defendant:
TCP 595 E 7th LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Thomas Francis Meade
Defendant:
City of Boston Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Wan Sum Ng and John Does 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Andrew J Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
